lorca와 같은 용도이며 rust를 위한 툴. 이름은 거꾸로(anagram)
https://github.com/Srinivasa314/alcro
lorca와 같은 용도이며 rust를 위한 툴. 이름은 거꾸로(anagram)
https://github.com/Srinivasa314/alcro
Somewhat like giving instructions to someone who always stops you to ask you to clarify what you mean, versus someone who always nods along and seems to understand you, though you’re not always sure they’re absorbing everything.
I also started with the book instead of just attempting to dive in headfirst. This was massively helpful, and probably the best introduction to any programming language I’ve ever experienced.
Haskell works exceptionally well as an application language, especially for web applications and networked servers. Haskell has seen productive use in everything from financial technology to non-profit web platforms. We believe Haskell excels when you want to be able to maintain quality and maintainability without compromising developer productivity.
Rust is stronger for systems programming, embedded, game development, and high-performance computing. Rust is more reliably performant than Haskell, relying less on compiler magic and more on zero-cost abstractions. This emphasis means that the designers try to introduce as much programming convenience as possible where it won’t involuntarily reduce performance. Rust’s Iterators is an excellent example of this. Haskell tries to obtain some of these benefits with the use of developer-written rewrite rules which are notoriously brittle and hard to debug.
Haskell is going to be stronger when you need maximum productivity when going from a prototype to a production-ready system that can nimbly handle functional and infrastructural changes. Rust can be a better choice when you can plan a bit more and are willing to sacrifice some productivity for better performance or because your project requires a fully capable systems language.